Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Report saying doctors "butchered" women is rhetorical hyperbole: high incidence of Caesarian deliveries makes doctor's actions matter of great public concern

Article Abstract:

The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled in Romero v. Thomson Newspapers that the libel suit against the Daily Advertiser newspaper should be dismissed because the plaintiff failed to show the actual malice. The Court reversed the lower court in ruling that actual malice must be shown even thought the plaintiff is a private figure because the matter was of great public concern. The suit was brought by a doctor mentioned in an article that asserted his hospital had the highest rate of Caesarean births in the nation.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
Physicians, Medical professions, Media coverage, Louisiana

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Blackmail' and 'extortion' are opinion, protected as rhetorical hyperbole

Article Abstract:

The 9th Circuit Court ruled that the terms extortion and blackmail used in an editorial constituted rhetorical hyperbole and so were protected speech under the First Amendment. Former Honolulu, HI Mayor Frank Fasi sued the Honolulu Star-Bulletin and the Advertiser for libel based on an editorial about a rezoning proposal that characterized the proposal as legalized blackmail. The court found that no reasonable reader would have interpreted the use of those words as fact and therefore there was no libel.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1997
United States, Freedom of speech, Hyperbole

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ex-Beatle's remarks over dispute were 'rhetorical hyperbole.' (George Harrison) (Hawaii)

Article Abstract:

The Hawaii Supreme Court dismissed a libel suit against former Beatle George Harrison in July 1998. Two neighbors of Harrison sued him over a statement he made at a press conference after another case in which a court awarded the neighbors the right to cross Harrison's property. The court state Harrison's remarks were rhetorical and not libelous, and ordered the neighbors to pay Harrison's legal costs.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
Harrison, George (Musician)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Libel and slander, Hawaii
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Doing investigations after a hurricane: Coastal areas. Sunshine week will highlight importance of open government
  • Abstracts: Dangerous skies: Agency roadblocks overcome to show millions of potential weapons seized. Federal money: Security official equally confounded by list documenting stakes critical assets
  • Abstracts: Paper allowed to print photo of juvenile murder suspect: Rehnquist denies appeal to 13-year-old boy charged in mobile home fire
  • Abstracts: Judge's failure to justify sealing jury information with hearing and factual findings leads to reversal. Newspaper loses appeal of order barring press from courtroom
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.