Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

The privacy paradox

Article Abstract:

Restrictions to protect personal privacy increasingly hamper the press and may cause a loss to the public good greater than the privacy protection gained. Case law restrictions include the increase in suits against the media such as fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress. New laws include those at the state level giving individuals the right to sue for activities such as following a newsworthy subject. Limits on access to data in government files are growing more common bassed on claims that releasing such information would invade personal privacy.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
Confidential communications, Journalistic privilege

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Media gains access to 'Unabomber' psychiatric report

Article Abstract:

The 9th Circuit federal appeals panel in San Francisco, CA, ruled in Aug 1998 that The San Francisco Examiner and CBS Broadcasting, Inc., had a right of access to a redacted psychological report about Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski. The panel ruled that the public's right to know outweighed Kaczynski's right to privacy. The public has a right to know about judicial proceedings and information used to determine the fate of criminal defendants. The report was edited to protect third parties.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Kaczynski, Theodore

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Public interest in Hoover's files warrants review

Article Abstract:

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Summers v. Department of Justice that the privacy concerns of the individuals mentioned in the J. Edgar Hoover files collected for political uses might outweigh public interest in those files. The appeals court ordered this case sent back to the trial court level which had ruled summarily for the government after considering this case for a decade.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Freedom of information
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Budget proposal. Survey finds members want more
  • Abstracts: Dangerous skies: Agency roadblocks overcome to show millions of potential weapons seized. Federal money: Security official equally confounded by list documenting stakes critical assets
  • Abstracts: The big one: trials and tribulations of high-stakes journalism. Attacks on style and substance
  • Abstracts: Pirandello's 'Sei Personaggi' and expressive form. Memory and madness in Pirandello's Enrico IV. Pirandello, the sacred, and the death of tragedy
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.