Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Military and naval science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Military and naval science

US shipyard consolidations: Why now? Why not? What effect?

Article Abstract:

The consolidations that have taken place in the shipbuilding industry in 1998 has been one of the top business stories in the US. What was formerly referred to as the `Big Six' has been reduced to the `Big Three,' namely General Dynamics, Litton Industries and Newport News Shipyard. Analysts point out that these consolidations are overdue, given the fact that other sectors of the defense industry have already consolidated. The bigger question, however, is the effect of these consolidations on the competitiveness of the indusry as a whole.

Author: George, James L.
Publisher: N & A Military Publishing Services
Publication Name: Naval Forces
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0722-8880
Year: 1999
Market information - general, Shipbuilding & Repair

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The U.S. Navy's new LPD-17

Article Abstract:

The US Navy has started building the San Antonio (LPD-17) class of amphibious transport dock ships as part of its fleet modernization efforts for the 21st century. Compared to its predecessor, the LPD-4, the LPD-17 will have faster, longer and have more vehicle capacity. In addition, the it will feature greater medical capabilities, such as more bed wards and two operating rooms. The amphibious ship will also be powered by diesel motors and will have vastly improved air capabilities.

Author: George, James L.
Publisher: N & A Military Publishing Services
Publication Name: Naval Forces
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0722-8880
Year: 1999
Product information, Amphibious Vessels NEC, Amphibious military vehicles

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


U.S. defence industry woes: the mission solution

Article Abstract:

One issue that a panel of experts from the private sector may have given little thought in formulating recommendations to boost the US defense industry is weaponry cost. Although most of the panel's recommendations, particularly changes in export control procedures, are viable, the fact remains that US defense companies are building too many expensive weapon systems that even the richest countries may not afford.

Author: George, James L.
Publisher: N & A Military Publishing Services
Publication Name: Naval Forces
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0722-8880
Year: 2000
Public affairs, Ordnance & Accessories, All Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: US to trial new submarine communications buoy. Coyote target completes development testing. Raising the standard
  • Abstracts: Guarding America's coast at the dawn of the 20th century. The Royal Navy's tutorial on the fine points of firing
  • Abstracts: The "Citizen Course" : compulsory for all. The Army's training policy
  • Abstracts: Australia considers Anzac proposal. Ship self-defence upgrades keep pace with new threats. Australia's Super Seasprite cuts its teeth
  • Abstracts: Tricare goes nationwide. Ryan hits funding shortfalls. AEF development on track
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.