At issue: should the federal government launch a nationwide lead-abatement program?

Article Abstract:

Abatement of lead presents the best preventive solution to lead poisoning of children. It can elevate housing conditions and aid in employment shortage by creating positions for workers in the abatement program. The costs of lead abatement are minimal as compared to the financial and emotional toll on families of lead poisoning victims. On the other hand, some sectors disagree with the use of lead abatement. They claim other preventive measures such as training children how to drink from tap water and proper handling of dust, soil and paint can be just as effective at a lesser cost.

Prevention

---

State initiatives

Article Abstract:

Enforcing laws to prevent lead poisoning is being practiced by less than 50% of all the states. California and Massachusetts are the two leading advocates in minimizing the risk factors of lead exposure. For instance, Massachusetts has a law which demands blood screening of children by the age of two. California, for its part, calls for product testing for manufacturers of ceramicware. Unfortunately, such laws can also exacerbate already existing problems such as those dealing with housing and financial budget of the state.

Social policy, State government

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: At issue: Do the media devote too much attention to celebrities?. Celebrity culture
• Abstracts: At issue: should the United States sign a comprehensive test ban on nuclear weapons? U.S. policy in Asia
• Abstracts: Are smoking bans justified? Should the government restrict the advertising, promotion, distribution and marketing of cigarettes to teenagers?
• Abstracts: Are U.S. CEOs overpaid? Government's dilemma. Shareholder activism
• Abstracts: Lethal legacy. 20th-century reaction. Major lead sources

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.