Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Government opposes Microsoft's request for a stay

Article Abstract:

Microsoft's filing for a stay of the ruling has been opposed by the Department of Justice. The government states that it is an attempt to prevent the trial from reaching the Supreme Court. The Expediting Act entails that an antitrust trial of public importance should be sent directly to the Supreme Court and this is an action that Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson favors.

Author: Brinkley, Joel
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 2000
Laws, regulations and rules, United States. Department of Justice, Antitrust issue

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


U.S. argues against delay that Microsoft is seeking; sees no need to await Supreme Court ruling

Article Abstract:

The US Justice Dept.'s Antitrust Div. and 18 states are urging the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia not to grant a stay of court proceedings on the antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. Microsoft has asked for a stay, pending a hearing of the case by the US Supreme Court in Oct. 2001. The Justice Dept. avows that any delay in remedy proceedings to Microsoft's violations of the Sherman Act will cause uncertainty to consumers and the software industry.

Author: Labaton, Stephen
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 2001
Company legal issue, United States. Department of Justice. Antitrust Division, United States. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judge is assigned to decide Microsoft antitrust penalties

Article Abstract:

As Microsoft introduces its controversial Windows XP operating system, federal justice Colleen Kollar-Kotelly was randomly assigned to determine the proper remedies for Microsoft's previous antitrust violations. Most of the complex legal issues have been resolved already by a federal appellate court, which will leave Judge Kollar-Kotelly only the task of determining the appropriate punishment. She is expected to conduct hearings soon and will also consider whether Microsoft should be required to modify Windows XP over antitrust concerns.

Author: Labaton, Stephen
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 2001
Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors, Antitrust Law, Evaluation, Judges, Remedies (Law), Kollar-Kotelly, Colleen

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Computer software industry, Software industry, Software, Cases, Microsoft Corp., Antitrust law, MSFT
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Microsoft split ordered: appeal could go directly to Supreme Court. Analysts get hints of progress in Microsoft lawsuit talks
  • Abstracts: AT&T puts a price on wireless offering; plans call for the stock sale to raise up to $13.2 billion. 2 phone giants said to be near deal to merge wireless units
  • Abstracts: Taco Bell abruptly drops the agency that created its popular wisecracking spokesdog. New ad agency prefers a homespun approach in pitching whiskey to savvy consumers
  • Abstracts: The fading copier king; Xerox has failed to capitalize on its own innovations. Xerox to take $625 million write-of and eliminate 5,200 jobs
  • Abstracts: Brit wants U.S. right of way; CEP of Virgin seeks Congress' OK to start airline. 'Romance of the air' begins
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.