Cognitive pathology and moral judgment in managers
Article Abstract:
Research into the cognitive psychology of managerial and economic judgment can be analyzed by using a number of traditional moral values upon which philosophers and religion scholars place strong emphasis. This interpretation can be taken to indicate that managers who pay attention to the views of cognitive philosophers about how choices should be made rationally are in danger of compromising widely held moral values whose credibility is never doubted by psychologists. It is possible to argue that people are rational deontologists, holding deontological values that prevent them making financial optimal choices.
Publication Name: Business Ethics Quarterly
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 1052-150X
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Deception and mutual trust: a reply to Strudler
Article Abstract:
Deception in business negotiations is an ethically regrettable practice, contrary to Alan Strudler's advocacy of its occasional moral neutrality or benignity. The revised Mutual Trust principle interprets an individual's diminished obligation to refrain from deception in terms of contextual trust-deficiency and the costs of moral behavior. Concepts and tools designed to build an environment of trust without harming mutual interests can reduce the use of deception. Strudler is too quick to dismiss mutual trust, while his position could cause harm by supporting the status quo in negotiation.
Publication Name: Business Ethics Quarterly
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 1052-150X
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
On the ethics of deception in negotiation
Article Abstract:
The mutual advantage approach seeks to explain the use of deception in business negotiations as a device of mutual advantage for the negotiating parties. According to the mutual advantage approach, deception provides a constructive channel of indirect communication for the concerned parties, who have mutual distrust for morally benign reasons. The strategy of self-defense, on the other hand, justifies deception as a response to an anticipated wrongdoing by a bargaining rival. Mutual advantage is better than self-defense at accounting for deception in negotiation.
Publication Name: Business Ethics Quarterly
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 1052-150X
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Join the club: a modest proposal to increase availability of donor organs. On giving preference to prior volunteers when allocating organs for transplantation
- Abstracts: Character and integrity in organizations: the civilization of the workplace. Genetically modified foods: the creation of trust and access to global markets
- Abstracts: Empathy and universalizability. Thomson on distress. Sympathy, simulation, and the impartial spectator
- Abstracts: Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation. Straw men with broken legs: a response to Per Sundstrom
- Abstracts: The place of ethics in business: shifting paradigms ? Ideology and the economic social contract in a downsizing environment