Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Corporate attorney whistle-blowing: devising a proper standard

Article Abstract:

Ethical analysis of disclosure of an illegal activity in a business corporation is presented. Of all the standards discussed, the standard of broad permissibility is most likely the best choice for corporate lawyers. Mandatory disclosure denies attorneys the right to choose and benefit employers engaged in clandestine activities. The standard ofbroad permissibility would require attorneys to justify violations of confidentiality and would allow revelation of the illegal activity, consideringthe net social benefit of the disclosure.

Author: Dunfee, Thomas W., Maurer, Virginia G.
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1992
Corporate counsel, Ethical aspects, Whistle blowing, Whistleblowing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Development of ethical awareness: a model for a community business ethics forum

Article Abstract:

There is an urgent need to develop ethical awareness among the business community. However, the lack of knowledge of ethical vocabulary and theory and the lack of management support have hampered the success of ethics awareness programs. Development of codes of conduct does not necessarily deter unethical behavior in business. Training is necessary so that the codes can be effectively imposed. This can beaccomplished through the promotion of community business ethics forums.

Author: Cleary, Claudia M., Kendree, Jack M.
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1992
Conferences, meetings and seminars, Moral development

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Academic honesty in the business school: a case study

Article Abstract:

A case study reveals that sometimes the ideals of the business world and the academic communities may contradict. What is considered collaborative management style in business may be considered academic dishonesty in universities, particularly if two people come out with the same solution to a problem. Business students are encouraged to discuss problems and come to a solution by consensus. This behavior is often considered cheating at universities.

Author: Halfond, Jay A.
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1991
Academic etiquette

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Business ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Some paradoxes of whistleblowing. Professional responsibility: just following the rules? Technical decisions: time to rethink the engineer's reponsibilities?
  • Abstracts: Ethics in advertising: the players, the rules and the scorecard. Ethical distancing: rationalizing violations of organizational norms
  • Abstracts: Bodyworlds and the ethics of using human remains: a preliminary discussion. Elective ventilation
  • Abstracts: Issues of diversity in the globalisation of competencies: a study in a global mining company. Induction programmes in the age of "corporate culture": the "sophisticated subject"
  • Abstracts: Predicting noncompliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Scientific and social judgments of safety in the nuclear fuel waste management and disposal concept
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.