Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Liberalism and campus hate speech: a philosophical examination

Article Abstract:

A liberal justification for narrowly drawn campus regulations against hate speech is based on the idea that such speech wrongs its targets by treating them as moral subordinates. These wrongs are appropriate objects of regulation because they represent a common violation of the ideals of liberal democracy. To focus narrowly on speech acts of moral subordination, the rules should prohibit speech employing slurs and epithets directed at particular individuals with the intention of degrading them on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or sexual preference.

Author: Altman, Andrew
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1993
Ethical aspects, Hate speech, College discipline

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The independent value of freedom

Article Abstract:

Freedom has independent value, a position which supports liberal interest in the quantifiability of freedom. Ronald Dworkin and Will Kymlicka have taken the opposing position that freedom is not measurable, but instead refers to different kinds of freedom. Their position denies the independent value of freedom. Kinds of independent value that might apply include unconditional value, intrinsic value, nonspecific instrumental value, and constitutive value. Disvalues of freedom and the relation between freedom and distributive justice are also discussed.

Author: Carter, Ian
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1995
Liberty, Freedom, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Revisionist liberalism and the decline of culture

Article Abstract:

A liberal theory of justice which emphasizes individual rights cannot justify state support of the arts. For example, John Rawls's conception of a neutral rights-based constitution discounts any cultural concerns. Ronald Dworkin's argument based on the obligation to provide a level of culture to future generations is unconvincing. A collectivist account which rejects mutual disinterest in favor of a social contract that protects the cultural life of the community is more compatible with the practice of majoritarian democracy.

Author: Black, Samuel
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1992
Art and state, Cultural policy, Arts policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Liberalism, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Bodyworlds and the ethics of using human remains: a preliminary discussion. Elective ventilation
  • Abstracts: Bioethics at century's turn: can normative ethics be retrieved? Reply to Strong on principlism and casuistry
  • Abstracts: Global human resource management competence and judgment integrity capacity: towards a human centered organisation
  • Abstracts: Corporate attorney whistle-blowing: devising a proper standard. Academic honesty in the business school: a case study
  • Abstracts: Conceptions of choice and conceptions of autonomy. Social freedom and the test of moral responsibility. Rewarding regret
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.