Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

The universal drug testing of employees

Article Abstract:

Universal drug testing of employees is illegitimate in most cases due to ethical and practical reasons. Observations of Joseph DesJardins and Ronald Duska also substantiate this view. They criticize the practice as an infringement on the employees' right to privacy. However, their argument suffers because they limit the scope of drug testing to job-relevance. The right to privacy of employees can be considered only when their colleagues' safety is assured. Drug testing is also justifiable in cases where drug use affects employees' performance and the company's wellbeing.

Author: Birsch, Douglas
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1995
Criticism and interpretation, DesJardins, Joseph, Duska, Ronald

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Drug testing and privacy: why contract arguments do not work

Article Abstract:

Drug testing programs in US companies violate the individuals right to privacy as the genitals of the subjects are exposed before the test supervisors. Although the performance contract argument by DesJardins and Duska rightly addresses the moral entitlements of the parties to the contract, it fails to consider the moral obligations outside the contract. The time-based contract structure provided by Caste is also plagued by shortcomings. Americans and Canadians can hope that the ensuing conflict brings about an ethically and socially viable equilibrium.

Author: Carson, A. Scott
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1995
Business enterprises, Form of contract

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judgement, accountability, and 'information': a response to Machamer and Boylan

Article Abstract:

The news media does not have an overriding privilege to extract information to the detriment of an individual's privacy. Peter Machamer and Barbara Boylan claim that a social organization can have the right to access private information to perform their function. However, the news media has several, complex and interrelated goals, and it is therefore difficult to determine the particular purpose which necessitates access to information.

Author: Meyers, Christopher
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1995
Press, Freedom of information

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Ethical aspects, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Mandatory drug testing, Drug testing
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The subjectivity of welfare. Honoring and promoting values. Plural values and indeterminate rankings
  • Abstracts: Preventive ethics, professional integrity, and boundary setting: the clinical management of moral uncertainty
  • Abstracts: Deterrence and the fragility of rationality. Immoral intentions. Defending irrationality and lists
  • Abstracts: Welcoming another CMD instrument - the MES: but don't throw out the MJI or DIT just yet!
  • Abstracts: Moral thinking in management: an essential capability. Universalizability and reciprocity in international business ethics
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.