Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Was Hobbes a legal positivist?

Article Abstract:

Hobbes's theory of civil law is much closer to natural law theory than to legal positivism, although some recent commentators have classified him as a positivist. Legal positivism holds that legality is separate from morality, whereas natural law theory maintains that to be legally valid a norm must conform to a body of natural law that is discernible by human reason. Hobbes took the position that a subject is not obligated to obey commands that conflict with the right to self-preservation. The main difference between Hobbes's theory and Aquinas's account of natural law is that Hobbes recognizes only self-preservation as a natural good.

Author: Murphy, Mark C.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1995
United Kingdom, Natural law, Legal positivism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Two links of law and morality

Article Abstract:

Two links between law and morality, at least in modern Western societies, are developed from broader claims made by Lon Fuller and Philip Soper. From Fuller comes the idea that procedural requirements of law, which involve treating individuals as sources of strong moral claims, constrain the ability of government to act immorally. From Soper, the suggestion is derived that a claim to be just is a necessary aspect of modern legal systems.

Author: Brudney, Daniel
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1993
Political ethics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Hobbesian public reason

Article Abstract:

Thomas Hobbes believed social conflict could be best solved through an absolute ruler, and David Gauthier suggested limiting the scope and content of that authority. However, the best solution to the misuse of Hobbesian authority is by appealing to public principles. All members of a society would agree to uphold these principles, thus avoiding the dilemma implicit in Hobbes's argument and the regression of Gauthier's argument.

Author: Ridge, Michael
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1998
Political aspects, Social conflict, Authority, Principle (Philosophy), Reason, Gauthier, David

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Law, Ethics, Law and ethics, Hobbes, Thomas
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Markets in women's sexual labor. What Is the Point of Equality?(*). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship
  • Abstracts: Two concepts of liberalism. Civic education and social diversity. Introduction
  • Abstracts: Two concepts of liberalism. Kymlicka, liberalism, and respect for cultural minorities
  • Abstracts: Empathy and universalizability. Thomson on distress. Sympathy, simulation, and the impartial spectator
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.