Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Confidential media sources and the First Amendment

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court ruled in Cohen v Cowles Media Co that the First Amendment did not prevent a source whose confidentiality had been violated from suing under state contract rules. The majority decision of the court held that the First Amendment does not exempt the press from generally applicable laws. This decision is consistent with prior precedent and represents a fair balance between the press's First Amendment rights and the rights of news sources.

Author: Vermeule, C. Adrian
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1992
Freedom of the press

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Suspicionless drug testing and the Fourth Amendment: Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton that a school board policy authorizing drug testing of all student athletes without probable cause was not unreasonable. The strict scrutiny test would have been better suited to this case than the reasonableness test. The latter suffers due to its vagueness from the politics of the moment, which undermines the privacy safeguarded by the Constitution.

Author: Newsom, Kevin C.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
Searches and seizures, Mandatory drug testing, Drug testing, Probable cause

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Attorney-client privilege - dead or alive? A post-mortem analysis

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court, in Swidler & Berlin v. US in 1998, declared that criminal defense attorneys are bound by the attorney-client privilege even after their clients die. The Court accepted the argument that limiting the privilege in this context would chill the willingness of clients to speak freely to their lawyers. However, this reasoning may only be true for clients who expect to die soon.

Author: Lee, Kenneth K.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1999
United States, Practice of law, Attorney and client

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Confidential communications, Case Note, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Criminal anti-profit statutes and the First Amendment. The First Amendment and cable television. Unfree speech
  • Abstracts: Voluntary associations, professional organisations and the environmental movement in the United States
  • Abstracts: Freedom and the environment. Fighting for press freedom. Pushing for press freedom in Liberia
  • Abstracts: The impact of old politics and new politics value orientations on party choice - a comparative study. Minority governments and party politics: the political and institutional background to the 'Danish Miracle'
  • Abstracts: Five years of the international criminal court: Waiting for a day in court. An expanding Court
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.