Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Controlling ballistic missiles: how important? How to do it?

Article Abstract:

The need to control ballistic missiles does not carry as much weight as the need to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Missiles, unlike nuclear weapons, are not considered weapons of mass destruction and do not provide owner countries with the ability to disrupt the world balance. At any rate, as an initial measure in the campaign to rid the world of nuclear weapons, the control of missiles could be undertaken. This could be done through the institution of export controls and the establishment of bilateral and unilateral agreements on the matter.

Author: Harvey, John R., Rubin, Uzi
Publisher: Arms Control Association
Publication Name: Arms Control Today
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0196-125X
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Ballistic missiles

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


U.S. drops CTB 'early out' plan; test moratorium may be permanent

Article Abstract:

The United States changed its earlier policy designed to allow an 'easy exit' from the comprehensive test ban (CTB) treaty after a decade and has decided to take back its controversial proposal. The CTB is to be negotiated at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva. The decision to extend the moratorium would mean that the U.S. will not test again even if a CTB is not signed by September 30, 1996. Congress had passed legislation in 1992 prohibiting further U.S. testing unless another country conducts tests after September 1996.

Author: Lockwood, Dunbar
Publisher: Arms Control Association
Publication Name: Arms Control Today
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0196-125X
Year: 1995
Political aspects, Nuclear disarmament, Conference on Disarmament

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Joint statement on weapons reductions

Article Abstract:

The US president and his Russian counterpart after reviewing the December 1994 meeting of the Gore-Chernomyrdin commission on nuclear issues reasserted their pledge for nuclear disarmament. They expressed the willingness to pass on the information on the stockpile of nuclear warheads, fissile materials and to evolve a system to do so on a regular basis. The two countries will pursue negotiation to enhance transparency and irreversibility of nuclear arms reduction.

Publisher: Arms Control Association
Publication Name: Arms Control Today
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0196-125X
Year: 1995
United States, Russia, United States foreign relations, Russian foreign relations, Transcript

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Nuclear arms control
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Ballistic missile defense: is the U.S. 'rushing to failure'? Toward an agreement with Russia on missile defense
  • Abstracts: National adaptation to European integration: the importance of institutional veto points. The European Union budget, the balanced budget rule and the development of common European policies
  • Abstracts: Decision concerning the implementation of the tax sharing system. Verbal publicity material concerning support for the curbing of Lin Xiangao's illegal activities by the religious affairs department of the Guangzhou municipal people's government (December 5, 1983)
  • Abstracts: Kenya tries again. Kuchma's failed authoritarianism. Peru's decade of living dangerously
  • Abstracts: Critical condition. Dangers to Doha. Living with loss: Liberia's life
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.