Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Paternalism, unconscionability doctrine, and accommodation

Article Abstract:

The author argues that the unconscionability doctrine is a valid legal tool to foster equality in business transactions, and should not be discounted as paternalist, or interfering with commercial autonomy. While ethics can be cited as the reason to avoid supporting one-sided contracts within the legal system, it does not serve as a completely sufficient reason to refuse support for these types of contracts.

Author: Shiffrin, Seana Valentine
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Philosophy & Public Affairs
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0048-3915
Year: 2000
Interpretation and construction, Ethical aspects, Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition, Trade policy, Commercial policy, Paternalism, Contracts, Unconscionable, Unconscionable contracts, Obligations (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The managers have stolen capitalism

Article Abstract:

This article provides an interview with John Galbraith, one of America's most prominent economists. Galbraith addresses the current economic conditions of the United States, in which he accuses the Bush administration of doing nothing to resolve?the recession?and criticizes the tax plan to offer incentives to only powerful corporations and the very rich.

Author: Galbraith, John Kenneth
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: New Perspectives Quarterly
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0893-7850
Year: 2003
Government expenditures, Taxes, Economic policy, Interview, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, United States economic conditions, Bush, George W., Recessions, Tax policy, Galbraith, John Kenneth

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Collective bargaining for the professoriate: what the law says

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that college teachers were managers, and therefore exempt from the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act, one of which is the right of collective bargaining. This was a bad ruling, and the matter needs to be reexamined.

Author: Malamud, Deborah C.
Publisher: International Journal of Humanities and Peace
Publication Name: International Journal of Humanities and Peace
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 1042-4032
Year: 1999
Management, Officials and employees, Universities and colleges, College teachers, College faculty, Collective bargaining

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Perceived environmental uncertainty and participation in decisionmaking in the prediction of perceptions of the fairness of personnel decisions
  • Abstracts: The end of civil conflict in Colombia: the military, paramilitaries, and a new role for the United States. More borders, less conflict? Partition as a solution to ethnic civil wars
  • Abstracts: Post-traditional civil society and the radical center. Civil society; the space that matters most. Consumer society is the enemy
  • Abstracts: International and domestic forces in the postwar golden age. New Labor Party develops program for economic justice
  • Abstracts: What is peace and conflict education? A potential for human understanding and peace
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.