Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Sex differences in jealousy: not gone, not forgotten, and not explained by alternative hypothesis

Article Abstract:

The double-shot (DS) hypothesis fails to give an appropriate explanation about the sex differences in the weighting given to cues triggering sexual jealousy. It states that this difference is due to perceptual differences about the conditional probabilities of sexual and emotional infidelity. The hypothesis fails to explain the reasons for this difference. Sex differences are real and are independent of differences in socialization. However, the evolutionary hypothesis successfully accounts for these sex differences in reactions to infidelity.

Author: Larsen, Randy J., Buss, David M., Westen, Drew
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1996
Adultery

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States

Article Abstract:

Studies in the United States, Netherlands and Germany reveal that men and women differ in the weighting given to factors triggering sexual jealousy, and that the magnitude of the sex differences varies across cultures. This lends support to the evolutionary and cultural perspectives on sex and jealousy. Women give more importance to emotional infidelity, whereas, men give more importance to sexual infidelity. The evolutionary psychology of sexual jealousy and the influence of cultural input are discussed.

Author: Buunk, Bram P., Buss, David M., Angleitener, Alois, Oubaid, Viktor
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1996
Social aspects, United States, Analysis, Netherlands, Germany, Ethnopsychology, Cross-cultural psychology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sex differences in jealousy: evolution, physiology, and psychology

Article Abstract:

Sex differences in jealousy were studied in three experiments. Sexual infidelity and emotional infidelity responses were measured across the sexes in the first experiment. Physiological responses were measured in both sexes in study two while the subjects imagined sexual or emotional infidelity of their partners. Study 3 measured the effect of jealousy in a committed sexual relationship. Results showed marked gender differences which confirm the hypotheses.

Author: Larsen, Randy J., Buss, David M., Westen, Drew, Semmelroth, Jennifer
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Psychological aspects, Research, Sex differences (Psychology), Jealousy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment
  • Abstracts: Rural and urban differences in the commission of animal cruelty. Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: evaluating the problem of latent consequences in community notification laws
  • Abstracts: Adolescent gender differences in HIV-related sexual risk acts, social-cognitive factors and behavioral skills
  • Abstracts: Communication deviance in families of schizophrenic and manic patients. A prospective study of stressful life events and schizophrenic relapse
  • Abstracts: Clinical features of cocaine-induced paranoia. Clinical phenomenology and neurobiology of cocaine abstinence: a prospective inpatient study
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.