The committee charge, framing interpersonal agreement, and consensus models of group quantitative judgment

Article Abstract:

A model called social judgment scheme was utilized to forecast group quantitative judgements. The model, which is based on member preferences and positions, revealed that post-group member confidence during decision making was greater compared to that of parallel individuals. Individuals belonging to task-oriented groups manifested the highest confidence and are more prone to practice discrimination among fellow members with regards to assessment of contributions.

Behavior Theory, Decision-making, Models, Decision making, Human behavior, Organizational behavior, Judgment, Judgment (Psychology)

---

"Forgive me, I'm new": three experimental demonstrations of the effects of attempts to excuse poor performance

Article Abstract:

Previous research has noted that employees are keen to present positive images of themselves before their superiors. In cases where they fail to meet performance standards, many attribute their poor performance to external factors to neutralize negative impressions. Experiments are performed to study impressions of the performance of employees who are new to their jobs.

Employee performance appraisals, Workers, Performance appraisals

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: The effect of multiple anchors on anchoring in individual and group judgment. Choosing work group members: balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity
• Abstracts: The critical operating characteristic and the evaluation of expert judgment. Choice-based assessment of utility functions
• Abstracts: The influence of self-ratings versus peer ratings on supervisors' performance judgments. The effect of performance rating discrepancies on supervisors and subordinates

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.