Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Real estate industry

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Real estate industry

What the deferred exchange regulations forgot to tell you

Article Abstract:

IRC section 1031(a)(3) imposes a 45-day limit for the identification of replacement property in a deferred real estate exchange that must be complied with carefully. The count starts on the day after the first transaction, falls on the 45th day regardless of whether it is a non-business day and the IRS does not grant extensions even in cases such as the Los Angeles riots. Taxpayers can identify three properties, properties valued at less than 200% of the exchange or as many properties acquirable at 95% of fair market value in 180-days. Identification should be in writing and signed by the taxpayer.

Author: Cuff, Terence Floyd
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Real Estate Taxation
Subject: Real estate industry
ISSN: 0093-5107
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


What the deferred exchange regulations forgot to tell you - what is a prohibited basis-shifting transaction?

Article Abstract:

Taxpayers hoping to reduce taxes on real estate by using basis-shifting transactions should know that Section 1031(f) enacted by the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1989 restricts these transactions among relatives. Basis-shifting transactions involve the tax-free exchange of low- and high-basis properties followed by the sale of the low-basis property. Section 1031(f) subjected such transactions to taxation when they occur among related persons. However, Section 1031(f) established some exceptions to the related person rule such as the death of one party to the exchange within two years.

Author: Cuff, Terence Floyd
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Real Estate Taxation
Subject: Real estate industry
ISSN: 0093-5107
Year: 1993
Taxation, Real estate, Real property, Basis (Taxation), Related party transactions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


What the deferred exchange regulations forgot to tell you: Congress forgot to repeal the "at-risk" rules of Section 465

Article Abstract:

The proper application of IRC Section 465 at-risk and recapture rules to real property exchanges is unclear. Guidance is needed on at-risk issues such as exchanges that cross taxable years, replacement property and newly acquired property debt, and aggregation of relinquished and replacement property into a single activity. Tax advisers should be aware of the potential tax implications of real estate exchanges due to the at-risk rules.

Author: Cuff, Terence Floyd
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Real Estate Taxation
Subject: Real estate industry
ISSN: 0093-5107
Year: 1996
United States, Tax-free exchanges

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Real property exchanges, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Federal bank regulatory guidance clarifies that a broader definition of community development is applicable to all banks under the Community Reinvestment Act
  • Abstracts: Plastics: The customer's location is (almost) always right. Global rationalization drives auto site selection
  • Abstracts: Breakthrough projects: opening up new location gateways. The high-tech edge: whether bleeding or leading, it's transforming business expansion
  • Abstracts: Recession squeezes states in '92, forces budget cuts, tax hikes. Sweet music from Nashville: issue-packed IDRC Congress sets record
  • Abstracts: Changes to IRC section 179 benefit residential landlords. Tax consequences of mortgage points. Current developments
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.