Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Risky business

Article Abstract:

Lump-sum or fixed-price agreements entail a lot of risks for a number of reasons such as human variability, unpredictability of systems, variability of project conditions, variability of client and imprecise labor reporting. These type of contracts are not necessarily bad but firms should have a clear strategy that matches their strengths in order to deal with these kind of contracts. Low-cost production-oriented firms might assume the risks and seek lump-pricing to generate high returns. Niche-oriented, value-added firms are not in the best positions to take these risks and should look for less risky agreements.

Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Representing the city

Article Abstract:

A Louisiana appellate court has instructed the city to pay the retainer due to the contractor once the engineering firm that represents the city issues a recommendation of acceptance. The Diamond B Construction Co., Inc., sued and won in a trial court when the city of Plaquemine failed to pay the contract sum to the firm. According to the court, the city must pay the difference between the entire retainer due and the value of incomplete items to the engineering firm. This is also true if the city feels that the contractor has not fulfilled its obligations in accordance with the contract.

Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1996
Plaquemine, Louisiana

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Spotting specs offenders

Article Abstract:

Owners, contractors and engineers cause most of the legal disputes from contract violations of construction projects. Owners who want to pay the least amount disregard project specifications. Contractors violate contracts by submitting low bids and then change orders from a different interpretation of the specifications to cover up losses. Designers who refuse to visit a project or see specifications as a document to be strictly followed are liable to be sued by contractors for unrealistic project demands.

Author: Simons, Bryce
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1993
Analysis, Breach of contract

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Construction industry, Contracts, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Gyro cheques. Everything with chips. Field of dreams
  • Abstracts: Tool changes. Reaching for the highlands. Force of attraction
  • Abstracts: Recycling on the Mississippi. Crossing the Hollandsch Diep. Cellular confinement system helps hold slope
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.