Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

"Citizen-soldiers" or anonymous justice: reconciling the Sixth Amendment right of the accused, the First Amendment right of the media and the privacy right of jurors

Article Abstract:

The issue of media access to information about jurors requires balancing three classes of rights: the accused's right to a fair trial under the Sixth Amendment, the media's First Amendment rights and the jurors' privacy rights. State and federal courts have been inconsistent in their attempts to balance these rights. The rights should be weighted differently at pre-empanelment, trial and post-trial stages. Fair trial rights are most important before the trial, whereas jurors' privacy rights should be respected at pre-empanelment and post-trial stages. The media's access rights increase during the trial.

Author: Litt, Marc O.
Publisher: Columbia University School of Law
Publication Name: Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0010-1923
Year: 1992
Media coverage, Free press and fair trial, Pretrial publicity, Right to fair and impartial trial, Jury, Juries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reining in the national drug testing epidemic

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's 1997 decision in Chandler v. Miller correctly stuck down a Georgia statute mandating drug tests for state office candidates as a violation of the 4th Amendment. The Court erred in not distinguishing its prior cases and particularly in not overruling 1989's National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab. Clarity of 4th Amendment doctrine regarding drug-testing requires the Court to eliminate from purview the factually substantially similar Von Raab.

Author: Brown, Nathan A.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Suspicionless drug urinalysis of public school teachers: the concern for student safety cannot outweigh teachers' legitimate privacy interests

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Knox County Ass'n of Educators v. Knox County Board of Education, rejecting a 4th Amendment challenge to mandatory drug testing of public school teachers and other employees. Topics include the question of whether teachers hold safety-sensitive positions.

Author: Schmidt, Karin
Publisher: Columbia University School of Law
Publication Name: Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0010-1923
Year: 2001
United States, Teachers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, United States, Searches and seizures, Mandatory drug testing, Drug testing, Case Note
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Religious equality and the First Amendment. Responding to the crisis in death penalty representation. Fitting religion into the nation's cultural landscape
  • Abstracts: Gender and race in the sexuality education classroom: learning from the experiences of students and teachers. Sexuality education is debated as restrictive programs gain popularity
  • Abstracts: Taking a byte out of the First Amendment: how free is speech in cyberspace? Joyce Meskis, pushing books and free speech
  • Abstracts: Patterns of restructuring in research, development and innovation activities in central and eastern European countries: an analysis based on S & T indicators
  • Abstracts: Assessing diversity climate: a field study of reactions to employer efforts to promote diversity. Work technology and the needs for achievement and nurturance among nurses
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.