Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Failures of explanation in Darwinian ecological anthropology

Article Abstract:

Darwinian ecological anthropologists (DEAs) favor generality of explanations over relevance to causal mechanisms. Their goal is the development of a model that is as widely applicable as possible, but this strategy does not promote the goal of finding causal explanations. DEAs have also failed to draw the appropriate lessons from failed predictions. For example, the work of Richerson and Boyd on mechanisms that lead to the spread of maladaptive behaviors has had little impact on the field. Moreover, DEAs have failed to incorporate the latest findings in ecological and evolutionary biology, nor have they followed the example set by Darwin himself.

Author: Vayda, Andrew P.
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1995
Methods, Influence, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Anthropology, Darwin, Charles, Behavior evolution, Behavioral evolution, Explanation, Behavioural evolution

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Practical rationality in social science explanation: A reply to Terrence Kelly

Article Abstract:

Terrence Kelly argues for a theory of practical rationality to explain and handle the issue of residential segregation in the United States, claiming that theories of 'racism as irrational and rational choice are not explanatorily in this regard. However, it is argued that the theory of practical rationality is equally inadequate and that better explanations could be offered by appeal to ethical theory.

Author: Keita, Lansana
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 2006
Analysis, Social sciences, Rationality

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Can understanding undermine explanation? The confused experience of revolution

Article Abstract:

The evidence from Iranian revolution of 1979 is used to explain casual mechanisms, the experience of revolution that is dominated by confusion, and people involved in revolutions. The revolutionary experience is characterized by confusion and objectivist approach may work best when structures persist throughout the period under study.

Author: Kurzman, Charles
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 2004
Iran, Evaluation, Revolutions, Iranian Revolution, 1978-1979

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Emerging technologies for hearing loss: an ecological approach. Connections between vision, hearing, and cognitive function in old age
  • Abstracts: Comparing cultures and comparing processes: Diachronic methods in cross-cultural anthropology. The case for complementarities
  • Abstracts: The effect of government taxation policies on spatial monopoly. Bilateral monopoly and industrial location: a cooperative outcome
  • Abstracts: The effect of government taxation policies on spatial monopoly. part 2 The optimal taxation of interregionally mobile capital under uncertainty
  • Abstracts: Spatial correlation and neighborhood quality. Neighborhood influence and technological change. Equilibria and entry in two interdependent spatial markets
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.