Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

In defense of Bacon

Article Abstract:

Feminists have criticized science for being based on misogynist sexual metaphors. Several authors have singled out the work of Francis Bacon as being especially objectionable for using metaphors of torture and rape to describe science. However, closer examination suggests that the feminists have overstated their case. Bacon's metaphors are actually more ambiguous than they suggest and should not be taken so seriously. Criticisms by Sandra Harding, Carolyn Merchant and Evelyn Fox Keller are discussed.

Author: Soble, Alan
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1995
Feminist criticism, Misogyny, Bacon, Francis (English philosopher, 1561-1626)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Bad apples: feminist politics and feminist scholarship

Article Abstract:

Writings by a number of prominent feminists were found to have exceptional and surprising mistakes. Among these feminist writers were Ruth Bleier, Ruth Hubbard, Susan Bordo, Sandra Harding and Rae Langton. It is believed that they may have made sweeping generalities due to their political passion and not necessarily out of zeitgeist. The political passion of these feminist writers might have blinded them into ignoring traditional standards of scholarship.

Author: Soble, Alan
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1999
Feminists, Feminist literature

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Ghost of Wittgenstein: Forms of life, scientific method, and cultural critique

Article Abstract:

Sociologists David Bloor and Harry Collins effectively blocked outside criticism of a scientific field, whether scientific, philosophical or political by constructing scientific reasoning as rule following within a collective. Ethnomethodologist Michael Lynch developed an alternative, Wittgensteinian reading that similarly blocked philosophical or political critique, while also disallowing analytical appeals to historical or institutional context.

Author: Lynch, William T.
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 2005
Works, Knowledge, Sociology of, Sociology of knowledge, Wittgenstein, Ludwig

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Criticism and interpretation, Science, Philosophy of science
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Increasing the persuasiveness of fear appeals: the effect of arousal and elaboration. Utility and choice: an empirical study of wife-husband decision making
  • Abstracts: The effects of precautionary saving motives on (S,s) bands for home purchases. Heterogeneous preferences and location choice with multi-product firms
  • Abstracts: The Kray fascination. Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Complexity, ecology and the materiality of Information
  • Abstracts: The moderating role of task characteristics in determining responses to a stressful work simulation. Team effectiveness under stress: a structural contingency approach
  • Abstracts: A prospective on macrocybernetic process management systems. An economic theory of technological products
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.