Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously?

Article Abstract:

There is no doubt that the psychological contract between employers and employees deserves retention because it reflects the individualization of the employer-employee relationship and stresses the dynamics of the distribution of power within an organization. Moreover, it presents an opportunity to integrate several significant organizational concepts. However, a host of conceptual and empirical issues still needs to be addressed by researchers for a fuller understanding of the nature of psychological contracts, not the least of which is clarification of the content and features of the contract.

Author: Guest, David E.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


On meaning, metaphor and the psychological contract: a response to Rousseau (1998)

Article Abstract:

Denise M. Rousseau argued that the psychological contract is a construct rather than a metaphor and that it is wrong to view the concept of the psychological contract as based on a metaphor inappropriately borrowed from law. However, rejecting the notion of the psychological contract as a metaphor rather than a construct does not in itself prove that it is derived from a legal metaphor. Furthermore, there is a close relationship between law and the concept of the psychological contract since the contract is defined based on the agreement between parties.

Author: Guest, David E.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Fitting square pegs into round holes: mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract

Article Abstract:

The limitations of existing empirical research on psychological contracts in the context of contingent work arrangements can be addressed using a dimensional approach. This methodology defines the psychological contract in terms of the idiosyncratic reciprocal expectations of employees with respect to their obligations and benefits. It also explicitly integrates how the employees view their relationship with the organization and prevents the proliferation of employee categories to reflect the growing complexity in work arrangements.

Author: Kidder, Deborah L., Parks, Judi McLean, Gallagher, Daniel G.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 1998
Employment Placement Agencies, Help supply services, Temporary Help NEC, Temporary employment services, Temporary employment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Psychological aspects, Analysis, Labor relations, Organizational change, Organizational behavior, Industrial psychology, Industrial-organizational psychology
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The 'problem' of the psychological contract considered. Assessing psychological contracts: issues, alternatives and measures
  • Abstracts: Changes in newcomers' psychological contracts during organizational socialization: a study of recruits entering the British Army
  • Abstracts: Rent control and complete contract equilibria. Landlords, tenants and the public sector in a spatial equilibrium model of rent control
  • Abstracts: Rent control and complete contract equilibria. Welfare analysis of rent control with side payments: a natural experiment in Cairo, Egypt
  • Abstracts: Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: a social exchange approach
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.