Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Report: ineffective assistance of counsel and lack of due process in death penalty cases

Article Abstract:

Indigent inmates facing capital punishment receive inadequate counsel and their due process rights are violated, an ABA Individual Rights and Responsibilities Section-sponsored discussion revealed. Court-appointed counsel is inadequately paid, lacks experience with capital cases, and does not have access to the resources public prosecutors do. Recent Supreme Court rulings have limited habeas writ and harmless error appeals, even though defendants cannot control the mistakes of their counsels or the courts. Capital punishment involves issues of race and ethics which society is reluctant to deal with.

Author: Tabak, Ronald J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1995
Evaluation, Reports, Right to counsel, Due process of law, Habeas corpus

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


International reaction to death penalty practices in the United States

Article Abstract:

The negative international reaction to the persistence of the death penalty in the United States is discussed. Amnesty International found in 1998 that the US has the highest death penalty population in the world. Many US extradition requests have been refused because of the persistence of this penalty.

Author: Koenig, Dorean Marguerite
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 2001
Public opinion, Discrimination in criminal justice administration, Criminal justice discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The death penalty, but sparingly

Article Abstract:

Arguments in favor of capital punishment are given. The spiraling crime rates since Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court's 1972 ruling nullifying capital punishment as then used without certain procedural safeguards, has turned public opinion and state legislatures in favor of the sentence.

Author: Fein, Bruce
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 2001
Usage, Violent crimes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Capital punishment, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A prospective on macrocybernetic process management systems. An economic theory of technological products
  • Abstracts: Measuring the pace of technological progress: implications for technological forecasting. Product growth models for medium-term forecasting of short life cycle products
  • Abstracts: Affective and Cognitive Factors in Soldiers' Reenlistment Decisions. Importance of specialized cognitive function in the selection of military pilots
  • Abstracts: A production analysis of the manufacturing industries in Iran. Energy Analysis of Japanese Industries
  • Abstracts: Spatial distribution of production and international trade: a note. Launhardt on Von Thunen's rings; a note
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.