Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

California laboratory backs its use of volunteers

Article Abstract:

A study into the impact on humans of methyl isothiocyanate, the active ingredient in the pesticide metam sodium, produced no negative effects at all, according to Michael Russell, a neurobiologist at the medical school of the University of California in Davis. This research was funded by a number of chemical companies concerned about animal data being used by California's Department of Pesticide Regulation for risk assessments. Some observers believe that metam sodium is extremely poisonous, and that the government should therefore not use human data to regulate it.

Author: Wadman, Meredith
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1998
Health aspects, Ethical aspects, Chemical industry, Pesticides industry, Pesticides

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Dispute over insect resistance to crops

Article Abstract:

Some observers believe that extensive planting of corn and cotton which has been genetically engineered to produce a toxin made by the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) will place great genetic pressure on insects. This will in turn cause resistance to Bt toxin to emerge very quickly. Furthermore, they believe that resistance management plans are insufficient. They claim that if Bt cotton is to continue to be used, it will be necessary to increase refuges in order to ensure that sufficient numbers of non-resistant insects are present.

Author: Wadman, Meredith
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1997
Environmental aspects, Plants, Plants (Organisms), Diseases and pests, Plant genetic engineering

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


US scientists call for fairer animal funding

Article Abstract:

US scientific societies have challenged a government policy they believe is harmful to biomedical research by penalizing those investigators who work with animal models. The current policy means that the overhead costs of animal research facilities (ARFs) may not be billed to an institutions's general overheads, as government accountants maintain that ARFs are specialized service facilities.

Author: Wadman, Meredith
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1998
Finance, Animal models in research, Animal research models

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Clean car programme falling short of goal. Scientists wary of weapons research agency. Congress warns nuclear labs of spy risk
  • Abstracts: Evidence from Turner's syndrome of an imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function. Listening out for subtle deficits
  • Abstracts: Journal prices lead libraries to back less costly initiatives. NRC backs open access to test-ban data
  • Abstracts: European passions cool as bill increases. Science returns to Einstein's rural retreat. Europe bids for molecular biology 'club'
  • Abstracts: S-nitrosylation regulates apoptosis. Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.