Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Plan to rank universities fails to impress

Article Abstract:

Britain is persuading their universities to become more focused on application however, the critics claim that the country risks undermining fundamental research in order to subsidize industry-funded projects. The roughly five-yearly process in which peer review is used to assess and reward individual university departments is widely acknowledged to have boosted the quality of British but the preparation and processing of submissions is found to be very time-consuming.

Author: Giles, Jim
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2006
Colleges & Universities, Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools, Colleges and universities, Universities and colleges, Rankings, Education policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


UK panel urges animal researchers to go public

Article Abstract:

A tiny fraction of Britain's thousand of biomedical scientists are willing to participate in discussions on animal research as UK scientist are physically attacked or sent to their homes. For this purpose Nuffield Council, the London-based think tank has removed solution such as allowing researchers get involved in debates on the subject, and allow government publish more details about the procedures used in animal experiment.

Author: Giles, Jim
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2005
Legal issues & crime, Product standards, safety, & recalls, Government regulation (cont), Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, Government regulation, Research and Testing Services, Medical Research, Epilepsy & Muscle Disease R&D, Legal/Government Regulation, Administration of Public Health Programs, Scientists, Ethics, Health Research Programs, Standards, Laws, regulations and rules, Ethical aspects, Animal experimentation, Medicine, Experimental

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Damned if they do, damned if they don't...

Article Abstract:

This article addresses the dilema of the British government whether or not embrace transgenic crops and begin commercial cultivation of genetically modified crops. On one side it wants to safeguard nation's economic competitiveness amidst other countries which are adopting it but on the other side the fear of defying the British public opinion.

Author: Giles, Jim
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2003
International aspects, Political aspects, Agricultural policy, Public opinion, Agricultural economics, Genetically modified crops, United Kingdom. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Gold-mine conversion eases closer. Expert panel retreats from major restructuring in blueprint for NIH. Safeguards and spurs
  • Abstracts: Melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice. Addition of human melanopsin renders mammalian cells photoresponsive
  • Abstracts: From hive minds to humans. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation
  • Abstracts: SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope
  • Abstracts: PS I want all the rights. Accusations of bias prompt NIH review of ethical guidelines
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.