Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

The use of trained dogs to discriminate human scent: a reply

Article Abstract:

Comments by Sommerville et al on research on the abilities to dogs to discriminate human odours rightly point to the ambiguity of the task set for dogs in a particular experiment. The dogs were unsure as to whether they should respond to odour from a part of the human anatomy, or to a particular person's smell. This ambiguity was a deliberate introduction into the experiment, and is important since law courts seek unambiguous evidence. Though dogs could be trained to solve the problem, the most scientific approach is to keep an open mind. Forensic evidence should also be reliable, and this is important in considering the use of dogs for law enforcement.

Author: Austad, Steven N., Brisbin, I.L., Jr.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The use of trained dogs to discriminate human scent

Article Abstract:

Caution over the ability of dogs to identify odours from different parts of one person's body, and distinguish this from other people's odours, has been expressed by Brisbin and Austad, but the issue could be solved through correct training methods. Dogs may be confused as to what they should be identifying, and whether this should be a part of the anatomy or an individual human. The fields of dog training methods and success rates should receive more attention in scientific journals, and so far their use in law enforcement appears to be justified.

Author: Broom, Donald M., Sommerville, Barbara A., Settle, Ray H., Darling, Frances M.C.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Female voles discriminate males' over-marks and prefer top-scent males

Article Abstract:

Many species of mammals use scent over-marketing as a form of competitive advertising. Observations in golden hamsters suggest that they may have specialized mechanisms for evaluating such marks. A study of meadow voles seeks to discover whether they have similar abilities. The study shows that female voles, exposed to the anogenital scent marks of two males, can determine which individual's scent is on top of an over-mark and consistently prefer the male that has scent-marked over another individual's scent. Details of the study are presented.

Author: Johnston, Robert E., Ferkin, Michael H., Sorokin, Evan S.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1997
Sexual behavior, Sexual behavior in animals, Animal sexual behavior, Voles

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Testing, Dog trainers, Police dogs
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Gene manipulation on plastic plates. Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Clone by clone by clone
  • Abstracts: The lab of last resort. MPs warn of threat to the science base
  • Abstracts: Stone legacy of skilled hands. Modern human origins backdated
  • Abstracts: Wolf reintroduction approved for Yellowstone and central Idaho. A reintroduction program for the conservation of the black howler monkey in Belize
  • Abstracts: Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on optic axon branching and remodelling in vivo. Inhibition of axonal growth by SNAP-25 antisense oligonucleotides in vitro and in vivo
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.