On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? A reply
Article Abstract:
Terminally ill cancer patients generally stop oral intake, raising moral and ethical concerns over whether such patients should be provided artificial feeding and fluid replacement. There is no substantial evidence showing that increased nutritional intake has a positive effect on dying patients. However, other treatable but potentially fatal complications in patients who are not dying imminently can mimic the natural stop of intake and so symptoms of dehydration, not present in those dying, should be checked. The decision to continue or cease treatment should be based on detailed analyses of gains and risks.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Artificial hydration and alimentation at the end of life: a reply to Craig
Article Abstract:
Gillian Craig raised ethical and legal concerns about palliative medical services but these are largely based on an incomplete understanding of the services. She uses two incomplete examples to indicate that artificial hydration and alimentation can delay the natural dying process and withholding the same can cause death. Actually, patients who can be treated using those processes are given them during palliative care. However, patients without thirst or hunger would unnecessarily be subjected to discomforts if hydration and alimentation were implemented and could actually die faster.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Palliative care - a euthanasia-free zone?
Article Abstract:
The palliative care movement in the UK has become linked to anti-euthanasia views. It has become a dominant philosophy that the principles palliative care, which involves the care of patients with diseases unresponsive to treatment, are contradictory to euthanasia. However, it is argued that this philosophy does not reflect the views of all palliative care professionals and that the availability of palliative care does not eliminate the desire of some patients to end their life.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Aging, research and families. Ethics and law for medical students: the core curriculum. Advance directives
- Abstracts: Leadership: toward new philosophical foundations. Is the convergence advocacy model of corporate governance the right model for globalization?
- Abstracts: Conflicting parts of happiness in Aristotle's ethics. Why modesty is a virtue. Aristotle for women who love too much
- Abstracts: Prudence and morality in Greek ethics. Internalist moral cognitivism and listlessness
- Abstracts: Blameless wrongdoing. Incompatibilism and the avoidability of blame. Constraining condemning