Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Finding fault

Article Abstract:

The lack of communication between contractors and architects results in a loss of millions of pounds sterling worth of contractual disputes a year. A 1987 NEDO report, 'Achieving Quality on Building Sites,' blames architects as the main culprits. All of 501 cases cited blamed poor quality design. Other faults were lack of design coordination, design was too difficult to build, non-viability of design and lack of designer understanding of materials. Director of Wilshire Construction (London) condemned tardy architect information, inadequate drawings, missing dimensions and ambiguous specifications.

Author: Stewart, Alastair
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Architects, Malpractice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judgement ways

Article Abstract:

ADR (alternative dispute resolution) greatly cuts costs and professional fees in construction disputes. Traditional forms of dispute resolution are highly expensive. In 1991, 85% of the Official Referee's Court's 1,317 cases were construction related. ADR can be: executive tribunals; independent expert appraisal; fast-track or non-binding adjuducation. The construction industry favours mediation as the best form of ADR. All forms use a neutral third party to reach agreement and lawyers are not needed in the majority of cases. The greatest problem with ADR is that a decison is not legally binding.

Author: Stewart, Alastair
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Usage, Dispute resolution (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Peace process

Article Abstract:

The DOE (Department of Environment) has agreed to a year-long study to resolve the main causes of contractual disputes in the UK construction industry by Aut 1993. The DOE has agreed to pay 125,000 pounds sterling, half of the sum required for the study. The first meeting between the DOE and consultants, contractors, subcontractors and clients was on Sep 10 1992. Topics discussed were: creation of new conditions or laws to prevent payment abuse by main contractors; and new forms of dispute resolution and ajudication.

Author: Stewart, Alastair
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Research, Construction, Building, Contractors, United Kingdom. Department of the Environment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Construction industry, Cases, Contracts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The living daylights. Light refreshment. Pane barrier
  • Abstracts: Peace process. Finding fault
  • Abstracts: International rescue. Autumn chill. Autumn gold
  • Abstracts: Fall guys use JCT81 design-and-build. Plugging those inslovency gaps. Critical acclaim for NJCC release
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.