Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Lord Saville bites back

Article Abstract:

Lord Saville, the UK Law Lord who chaired the Advisory Committee on Arbitration which was largely responsible for the Arbitration Act 1996, has rejected criticisms of this legislation. Opponents of the act have stated that the fact that courts no longer have the power to ignore an arbitration clause and opt for litigation will mean that contractors will no longer agree arbitration clauses in their contracts. Lord Saville has expressed the view that parties are free to agree whatever arbitration clauses they wish. If they choose, they can have no arbitration agreement, or they can have an optional arbitration agreement.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Mediation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Benefits of neutrality

Article Abstract:

The Centre for Dispute Resolution (CEDR) offers an alternative approach to solving contractual disputes by using an independent alternative dispute resolution professional, also known as a neutral. The formal dispute process concentrates on the issues causing the dispute, so that they don't become clouded by other irrelevant factors. A satisfactory conclusion is generally arrived at in much less time using CEDR than with arbitration procedures. The neutral must be suited to the position, however, for the process to be successful.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1995
Management, Practice, Dispute resolution (Law), Centre for Dispute Resolution

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Watching the wasteline

Article Abstract:

The UK construction industry has traditionally given very little consideration to environmental issues. Indeed, the industry has been responsible for a great deal of wastage. It is clear that wastage can be reduced, but only if there is a positive atmosphere in which teamwork can flourish. Disputes will inevitably arise, but it should be possible to manage them so that the minimum amount of time and effort is wasted.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1998
United Kingdom, Construction industry, Environmental aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Column
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Chill winds. Taking the arty line. Built to blast
  • Abstracts: Parallel plots. Starting over
  • Abstracts: Treasury bid worries banks. Tarmac shake-up in France. DOE demands Marsham Street redesign
  • Abstracts: Brick awards 1996. A wee bit long in the tooth. Credibility gap
  • Abstracts: At loggerheads. Democratic renewal. An open and shut case
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.