Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Engineering and manufacturing industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Engineering and manufacturing industries

Designing an effective compensation system

Article Abstract:

Most compensation systems in US companies use a system of annual evaluations which negatively impact efforts at quality improvement. The reward system can be more significant to quality improvement than annual evaluations because employees link it to pride in their work. Compensation systems should address the three factors of salary, benefits and other rewards, all of which have a different impact on employee performance. It is essential to separate rewards extended to individuals and to groups.

Author: Cleary, Michael J., Cleary, Timothy J.
Publisher: American Society for Quality Control, Inc.
Publication Name: Quality Progress
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0033-524X
Year: 1993
Management consulting services, Planning, Compensation and benefits, Quality control, Wages, Wages and salaries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The theory

Article Abstract:

Point # 12 of W. Edwards Deming's 14 points of management has a significant financial impact on employees by focusing on pride of workmanship with a consequent effect on pay and benefits. The relationship between compensation and achievement, however, is a complex undertaking because reward systems create distortion. US companies must adopt benefit systems congruent to Deming's philosophy, specifically those systems that relate company objectives to personal objectives.

Author: Cleary, Michael J., Cleary, Timothy J.
Publisher: American Society for Quality Control, Inc.
Publication Name: Quality Progress
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0033-524X
Year: 1993
Methods, Compensation management, Incentives (Business)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Renewing American civilization, pillar five: quality as defined by Deming

Article Abstract:

Six core principles of quality management can be adapted from W. Edward Deming's basic assumptions on quality. While producers invent value, it is consumers who define value for them. To improve future results, the process must also be improved. Deming also believes that people possess intrinsic motivation to do a good job. He considers every person, process and system as part of an interdependent larger system.

Author: Gingrich, Newt
Publisher: American Society for Quality Control, Inc.
Publication Name: Quality Progress
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0033-524X
Year: 1995
Cover Story, Transcript

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Total quality management, Deming, W. Edwards
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Nanoindentation testing yields new quality data. Indentation hardness. Indentation hardness testing
  • Abstracts: Bringing Maxwell's equations to heel. Enhancing Matlab-to-C++ programming. Interactive, object-oriented Xmath
  • Abstracts: Jenoptik sparks Jena Tech/Innovation Park. Germany hopes new innovation ministry will force closer industry-government ties
  • Abstracts: Adhesives catch up welding. Rolling electrode speeds welding. Energised tool stirs up welding
  • Abstracts: Tom breaks his promise. Barb blows the whistle
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.