Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Environmental services industry

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Environmental services industry

Rebutting fishable/swimmable stream use standards

Article Abstract:

A court case pitting the Idaho Mining Assn Inc against the EPA in 2000 serves as an example that challengers to the agency must prove that it has disregarded cogent evidence and common sense if they wish to show that the EPA has abused its discretion in setting a use designation or standard. In this particular case, a federal district court ruled that the EPA's designation of cold water biota uses for Shields Gulch, ID, was an abuse of its discretion. The court found that the EPA had no supporting biological, chemical or physical data concerning the suitability of Shields Gulch for cold water biota.

Author: Kucera, Dan
Publisher: Scranton Gillette Communications, Inc.
Publication Name: Water Engineering & Management
Subject: Environmental services industry
ISSN: 0273-2238
Year: 2000
Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs, Idaho, Environmental Protection Agency

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judicial equities override filtration requirement

Article Abstract:

A federal court denied an injunction by the Environmental Protection Agency against the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority regarding the EPA rule for filtration of surface water used for water supply. The Authority's alternative plan for water treatment was found to provide sufficiently safe water.

Author: Kucera, Dan
Publisher: Scranton Gillette Communications, Inc.
Publication Name: Water Engineering & Management
Subject: Environmental services industry
ISSN: 0273-2238
Year: 2001
Massachusetts, Water Supply, Cases, Column, United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Protection and preservation, Water-supply, Massachusetts. Water Resources Authority, Filtration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Risk of personal liability for environmental violations

Article Abstract:

An Indiana Supreme Court case held that officers, managers, operators and shareholders could be held personally liable for environmental damages, although application of this principle varies. A person, to be liable, must hold a position of responsibility related to the damages.

Author: Kucera, Dan
Publisher: Scranton Gillette Communications, Inc.
Publication Name: Water Engineering & Management
Subject: Environmental services industry
ISSN: 0273-2238
Year: 2001
Water Utilities, Natural resources, Interpretation and construction, Environmental aspects, Liability for environmental damages, Administrative responsibility

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Water utilities
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Getting down to business. Casting a wider net. Hoping for the best..
  • Abstracts: Investing in organics recycling. College, university and correctional facility composting. Controlling odors in biosolids recycling
  • Abstracts: Producing power from recycled organics. Renewables make progress on many fronts. Announcing: BioCycle textbooks
  • Abstracts: Mixed MSW composting facilities in the U.S.. A compost screening primer. Protective practices at grinding, screening operations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.