Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Did high court make broad sweep in ERISA ruling?

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in Mertens v. Hewitt Associates that retirees could not sue non-fiduciaries for monetary damages for advice given on an ERISA-governed pension plan. ERISA 502(a)(3), giving plan beneficiaries the right to equitable relief for violations of an ERISA plan's terms, was the statute section at issue. When Hewitt restructured, the company allowed Kaiser Steel to revise the actuarial assumptions on the Kaiser Steel Retirement Plan, and the assumptions Kaiser chose resulted in inadequate funding, which eventually led to termination of the plan.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Cases, Pension funds

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


High court asked to define 'willful violation' in ADEA

Article Abstract:

Hazen Paper Co v Biggens will give the US Supreme Court its 3rd opportunity to explain what constitutes a 'willful violation' of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Those found guilty of willful acts are liable for double damages. ADEA cases constituted 20% of the 2,166% increase in employment discrimination litigation between 1970 and 1989. ADEA plaintiffs tend to receive larger damage awards than plaintiffs in race or sex discrimination cases.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Remedies, Employment discrimination, Age discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Pa. business court: proponents push for second attempt

Article Abstract:

A law to establish the Pennsylvania Special Courts of Chancery, a new business court, will soon be introduced. This court might rival Delaware's Court of Chancery. It is hoped that the court would attract more businesses to Pennsylvania. The court could hear business disputes by both US and foreign parties which submit to its jurisdiction and its proponents hope the European Community would also litigate there.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Innovations, Laws, regulations and rules, Pennsylvania, Commercial courts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Arbitration makes sense in international intellectual property disputes
  • Abstracts: High court to resolve class action fight; if class can't be certified for suit, can it be for settlement? Indigent defense system KO'd: unconstitutional in La
  • Abstracts: More than the law; ancillary business growth continues. New Cal test. The Ide agenda; seeking "nothing short of revolution." (1993-94 A.B.A. president R. William Ide III)
  • Abstracts: Parsing Pinter four years later: defining a statutory seller under section 12 of the Securities Act. Rule 144A and integration
  • Abstracts: Model code of ethics approved for the editors of legal journals. New institute will be attempting to 'redefine' legal profession
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.