Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Litigation on implants moves to new frontier; jury says Dow Chemical is liable for silicone of related company, Dow Corning

Article Abstract:

An Oct 28 verdict awarding $14.1 million against Dow Chemical is the first to find that industrial giant solely liable for injuries caused by breast implants made by Dow Corning. Dow Chemical is a joint-venture partner and shareholder in Dow Corning, which recently sought Chapter 11 protection. Dow Chemical also began trial on Nov 1 in Detroit against 43 insurers, and was ordered on Nov 2 by the TX Supreme Court to stand trial, with 150 cases immediately involved and potentially thousands more.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Affiliated corporations, Texas, Personal injuries, Dow Chemical Co. (Midland, Michigan), Nevada, DOW, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Did Bronco class counsel roll over and settle? A judge, saying collusion possible, overturns a settlement - a sign of growing scrutiny of class actions

Article Abstract:

Challengers to class-action settlements were heartened by a decision to overturn a settlement regarding Ford's Bronco II trucks on the grounds of possible collusion. The settlement would have given plaintiffs only warnings, but $4 million to their counsel. The incident followed the rescinding of a class in a blood-products case, made to protect the defendants from potential bankruptcy. Courts in general are revisiting the issue of Rule 23 as mass torts swell in number.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Motor vehicles and car bodies, Utility Vehicles, Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing, United States, Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Automobiles, Sport utility vehicles, Ford Bronco II (Sport-utility vehicle)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Questions raised on class action

Article Abstract:

The breast implant litigation community is divided over the issue of a massive class action suit spearheaded by Cincinnati, OH, practitioner Stanley M. Chesley. Chesley's opponents have filed for decertification of the class action suit and petitioned for a consolidated multidistrict litigation. Cincinnati US District Judge Carl B. Rubin, who certified the class action quickly and without a hearing, has been accused of favoritism towards Chesley.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Product liability, Products liability, Breast implants, Analysis, Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Satisfaction or your money back; ruling says fees may be forfeited if client is unhappy with attorney conduct
  • Abstracts: John Gellene sentenced to 15 months; judge in ex-Milbank partner case blasts lawyers for focus on money over ethics
  • Abstracts: Late alternate valuation election forced estate to value property at the date of death. Assets included in estate because of prior QTIP election
  • Abstracts: Broadcasting violence; debate intensifies on whether media should be liable for school shootings. Dodging bullies; federal courts resist student-violence liability suits
  • Abstracts: Playing by the roles; to avoid liability, don't blur lines between of counsel and partner. A question of substance; sobriety checkpoints ok, but courts split on drug roadblocks
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.