Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Punishment versus cooperation in regulatory enforcement: a case study of OSHA

Article Abstract:

OSHA and other federal regulatory agencies are most likely to be successful if their enforcement policies contain a balance of punishment and cooperation. Cooperative methods alone will not ensure voluntary compliance because noncompliers put compliers at a competitive disadvantage in their businesses. The history of OSHA and relevant literature suggests punishment should be structured so that penalties increase in severity for repeat violators but should be tempered with experimental cooperative measures.

Author: Shapiro, Sidney A., Rabinowitz, Randy S.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1997
Case studies, Administrative sanctions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Agency priority setting and the review of existing rules

Article Abstract:

Administrative agencies should develop priority setting procedures that balance the need to promulgate new regulations, review existing regulations and respond to concerns raised by the public and other branches of government. Political pressure from both the Clinton Administration and Congressional Republicans has increased the interest in rule review, but historically agencies have focused on creating new regulations. Agencies must commit time to responding to concerns to promote accountability.

Author: Shapiro, Sidney A.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1996
Management, Political aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Voluntary regulatory compliance in theory and practice: the case of OSHA

Article Abstract:

The author discusses administrative agencies' use of voluntary compliance as a means of enforcement and uses the federal OSHA as a case study to examine the effectiveness of this form of regulation. The author concludes that voluntary compliance is likely to be effective in limited circumstances and would not be as effective as regulation, particularly concerning worker protection.

Author: Shapiro, Sidney A., Rabinowitz, Randy
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 2000
United States, Analysis, Evaluation, Occupational health and safety, Occupational safety and health, Protection and preservation, Industry regulations, Government regulation of business, Trade regulation, Acquiescence (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Practice, United States. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Administrative procedure, Administrative agencies, Government agencies
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Current issues in private placements: private/public offerings. Current issues in private placements: private public offerings
  • Abstracts: Tombstones: the Internet's impact upon SEC rules of engagement. SEC interpretive releases regarding use of Internet web sites to offer securities, solicit securities transactions or advertise investment services offshore (Securities Act release no. 33-7516) (March 23, 1998)
  • Abstracts: Current issues in private placements: private/public offerings. part 2 The statutory scheme for public and private offerings under the Securities Act of 1933
  • Abstracts: The questionable empirical basis of Article 2's incorporation strategy: a preliminary study. Confusion about custom: disentangling informal customs from standard contractual provisions
  • Abstracts: Bills to implement WIPO treaties ignite debate; congressional legislation has drawn fire over such issues as fair use and liability of OSPs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.