Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Replacement workers face grim future; NLRB decision requires reinstatement of strikers

Article Abstract:

The National Labor Relations Board ruled on Sept 1, 1998, that the Detroit Free Press and Detroit News withholding of key merit pay and overtime plans from a coalition of six unions during failed collective bargaining talks that started in 1995 amounted to unfair labor practices and ordered them to rehire hundreds of strikers by the end of the month. This rehiring was to take place even if it meant replacing the "permanent" replacements hired since the strike began in July 1995. Union officials declared a major victory and newspaper attorneys vowed an appeal.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Unfair labor practices, Strikebreakers, Strikes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


State says the first trial was just a sham; prosecutor, claiming judge was bribed to acquit, says he wants to try alleged hit man again

Article Abstract:

Cook County Circuit Judge Michael P. Toomin has ordered a second trial on murder charges for alleged mob hit-man Harry Aleman, who was acquitted in 1977 by a supposedly bribed judge. A federal informant told state prosecutors of that arrangement in 1993, but a subsequent, exhaustive search of US and English legal records yields no precedent. Judge Toomin decided that the double jeopardy defense requires both a final decision and an element of risk of being convicted. The latter was apparently not present.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Laws, regulations and rules, Illinois, Double jeopardy, Judicial corruption, Judicial misconduct, Assassins

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Lloyd's peers into brink in face of U.S. legal setback

Article Abstract:

London-based reinsurance titan Lloyd's may soon file for bankruptcy in the wake of an adverse ruling from a federal judge and fraud complaints from state agencies in Illinois and Arizona. Those events could persuade US investors to reject the company's Reconstruction and Renewal Plan, which addresses pre-1992 losses, as well as trigger new lawsuits. Litigants have long said public policy should bar Lloyd's from invoking a contract clause calling for litigation in London, since its own fraud is involved.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Insurance, Lloyd's of London, Conflict of laws, Insurance fraud

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Alternative dispute resolution: its value to estate planners. New guidance on ethics for estate planners
  • Abstracts: What's new in Blue; citation guidelines change along with the times. Blast prosecutor vows no media circus: Hartzler described as fair, low-key family man who has bomb-trial experience
  • Abstracts: Debates need minor players. Abortion decision undercuts rule of law. Courtroom jousts now done by committee
  • Abstracts: Edited comments concerning differentiating action and expression in a virtual world
  • Abstracts: Agreements to arbitrate statutory fair employment practices claims: unforeseen consequences for the at-will employer
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.