Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The uneasy case for uniform taxation

Article Abstract:

Efficiency and fairness rationales alone do not justify the use of uniform or optimal taxation schemes. Tax policies are often assessed based on fairness, defined as comparable treatment of similar taxpayers, and efficiency, defined as minimization of economic distortions. Tax policy-makers must assess the costs and benefits associated with any changes in tax policy. Tax laws that treat different taxpayers differently may not actually be unfair or inefficient. Nonuniform provisions may be needed for administrative reasons or to reduce economic distortions or market imperfections.

Author: Zolt, Eric M.
Publisher: Virginia Tax Review
Publication Name: Virginia Tax Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0735-9004
Year: 1996
Tax reform, Tax incidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The utility of the efficiency/equity dichotomy in tax policy analysis

Article Abstract:

Kenneth Arrow's Impossibility Theorem suggests that subjective judgments cannot be completely eliminated from any valuable system of analyzing tax policy. Arrow found that there was no model of aggregating individual preferences that would satisfy all social welfare criteria. This result suggests that pure efficiency analysis still has value judgments implicit to it and that the efficiency/equity dichotomy is of limited merit. The better approach is to acknowledge distributional justice issues explicitly in tax policy models such as the optimal tax model.

Author: Crawford, Patrick B.
Publisher: Virginia Tax Review
Publication Name: Virginia Tax Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0735-9004
Year: 1997
Models, Welfare economics, Distributive justice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Community property with right of survivorship: uneasy lies the head that wears a crown of surviving spouse for federal income tax basis purposes

Article Abstract:

Application of rules of statutory interpretation to IRC section 2040(b) leads to the conclusion that the language is inapplicable to community property with right of survivorship. This would be consistent with the great likelihood that such property is not subject to section 2033. The result is neither half of the community property receiving the section 1014(b) fair market value basis step-up. Section 2040 should be amended to cure this problem.

Author: Andrews, Arthur W.
Publisher: Virginia Tax Review
Publication Name: Virginia Tax Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0735-9004
Year: 1998
Married Persons, Taxation, Laws, regulations and rules, Married people, Basis (Taxation), Community property

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Tax law, Economic aspects, Tax policy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A case for the use of a broad court equity power to facilitate Chapter 11 reorganization. The preservation and prosecution of avoidance actions post-confirmation
  • Abstracts: Values for probation, society and beyond. Risk management and rehabilitation in the probation service: collision and collusion
  • Abstracts: Beyond Nuremberg: fifty years later, the debate continues on informed consent
  • Abstracts: Menu for success. Be it ever so unusual ... finding odd spaces can ease the minds of lawyers and their clients
  • Abstracts: 'Return to sender' won't cut it; although privileged, misdirected e-mail on the Internet poses risks. Securing the premises: simple changes in office policy, setup can safeguard a small practice
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.