Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

NATO paper outlines approach to CFE Treaty 'Modernization.'(News and Negotiations)(Conventional Armed Forces in Europe)

Article Abstract:

The NATO paper 'Scope and Parameters of the Process for Improving the Operation of the Conventional Armed Forces of Europe (CFE) Treaty' calls for the treaty's modernization in the light of post-Cold War political realities. The paper favours a review of the treaty's group structure, zonal limits on conventional weapons, and the maintenance of all existing categories and types of treaty-limited equipment. The negotiations of the treaty's modernization are linked to NATO's expansion plans, which would affect the overall balance of conventional forces established by the CFE Treaty.

Author: Walkling, Sarah
Publisher: Arms Control Association
Publication Name: Arms Control Today
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0196-125X
Year: 1996
Evaluation, Treaties, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Conventional Forces in Europe, Treaty revisions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


111 states consider draft treaty banning anti-personnel landmines

Article Abstract:

One hundred eleven (111) states examined the draft treaty prohibiting anti-personnel landmines by Dec 4, 1997 during the Feb 12-14, 1997 meeting in Vienna, Austria. The treaty will be redrafted due to the opposing views of other states about the draft's verification regime and the time frame for destroying the land mines. The new version will be presented on Jun 24-27, 1997 in Brussels, Belgium. Negotiations will be concluded by the end of Sep 1997 in Oslo, Norway. For now, 58 states are already prepared to sign a treaty in Ottawa, Ontario.

Author: Walkling, Sarah
Publisher: Arms Control Association
Publication Name: Arms Control Today
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0196-125X
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Political aspects, Defense programs, Mines, Military, Military mines, Defense contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


First CCW review conference ends in discord over landmines

Article Abstract:

The first review conference of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) concluded two days before schedule, on October 11, 1995, due to disagreement over methods to stem the worldwide threat of anti-personnel landmines to civilians. Russia, China, India and Pakistan opposed the proposal to restrict the use of anti-personnel landmines in armed conflicts. However, it was agreed to prohibit the use and transfer of blinding laser weapons. In January and April 1996, the CCW parties will hold expert level meetings in Geneva.

Author: Walkling, Sarah
Publisher: Arms Control Association
Publication Name: Arms Control Today
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0196-125X
Year: 1995
Reports, International aspects, Civil defense, Conferences and conventions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Notes on the theory of organization. Organization as a technical problem. Science, values and public administration
  • Abstracts: A challenge for the World Trade Organization: towards a true transnational law. Contextual imperatives of dispute resolution mechanisms; some hypotheses and their applications in the Uruguay Round and NAFTA
  • Abstracts: Main features of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, and implications for the trading system
  • Abstracts: A minimalist approach to the Fourteenth Amendment. The impact of the constitutional revolution of 1937 on the dormant commerce clause - a case study in the decline of state autonomy
  • Abstracts: Des Moines NAACP sends clear message to Clarence Thomas. Jackson speaks out on Newt, Thomas, and keeping the faith
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.