Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Protecting privacy: what states can and cannot do

Article Abstract:

Proponents of privacy rights are preferring to bring cases to the state courts. The current US Supreme Court's restrictive view of privacy rights is leading privacy advocates to avoid the federal court system. However, these advocates should know the strengths and weaknesses in the state constitutions' protection of privacy. State constitutions may imply privacy rights even if such guarantees are not stated explicitly. Moreover, state constitutional law is subject to political pressure since state judges are often elected.

Author: Kritchevsky, Barbara
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1992
Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Constitutions, State, State constitutions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The constitutional right to "conservative" revolution

Article Abstract:

The constitutional right to revolution is not an oxymoron, but for a revolution to be constitutional, it would have to be an attempt to preserve or return to constitutional values. Critics that see constitutionalism and revolution in complete conflict mistakenly equate overthrowing the government with overthrowing the constitutional order. The coexistence of revolution and constitution can both add stability and continuity to the process of revolution and provide a check against unconstitutional governments.

Author: Williams, David C.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Revolutions, Government, Resistance to, Government resistance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


United Nations special rapporteur calls upon United States to halt executions

Article Abstract:

The UN's Special Rapporteur, Bacre Waly Ndiaye, made a US visit in late 1997 to investigate allegations that international instruments' fair trial procedures and provisions limiting the death penalty were not being followed in the US. The report recommended that the US stop executions until able to ensure that litigation of death penalty cases is fair, impartial and in accordance with due process. The Special Rapporteur also notes that people opposed to the death penalty are less likely to sit on a jury.

Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1998
Capital punishment, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: How is investment financed? A study of Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. part 2 Wage profiles: shapes and variations
  • Abstracts: Sorting the hope from the hype: Practical suggestions for community-based AIDS treatment education. Older Americans with HIV/AIDS
  • Abstracts: Falling through the cracks: voting rights and the census. Transforming Section 8: using federal housing subsidies to promote individual housing choice and desegregation
  • Abstracts: Report: ineffective assistance of counsel and lack of due process in death penalty cases. International reaction to death penalty practices in the United States
  • Abstracts: Social background and social context effects on young men's idleness transitions. Assessing differential item validity of the AIDS-related social skills questionnaire among African adolescents
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.