Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

Article Abstract:

It is very hard for peer reviewers to judge scientific merit without reference to gender, according to research based on the peer-review system of the Swedish Medical Council. Peer reviewers tend to over-estimate the achievements of male scientists and under-estimate those of female scientists. They regard female scientists as being particularly deficient in scientific competence, which is generally seen as directly related to the number and quality of scientific publications of each applicant. This research indicates that there is an urgent need to develop a peer-review system which takes the weaknesses of human nature into account.

Author: Wenneras, Christine, Wold, Agnes
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1997
Research, Peer review of research grant proposals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Action, not words

Article Abstract:

Annual government report on gender equality estimated that fewer than 12% of working scientists in Japan are women, the lowest proportion of any leading industrial nation, leading Japanese institutions to publicly acknowledge the problem and set targets to redress it. For this purpose a cabinet committee on gender has set target of having 30% of all 'leading positions' in society, which should include senior researchers occupied by women by 2020.

Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2005
Japan, Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Save our city!

Article Abstract:

The Italian government is building a series of massive barriers to protect Venice from flooding. The various arguments put forth by the scientists regarding the success or failure of the plan is discussed.

Author: Nosenga, Nicola
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2003
Italy, Venice, Italy, Flood damage prevention

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Social aspects, Women scientists
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Nicotine activates and desensitizes midbrain dopamine neurons. Disease threat to European fish
  • Abstracts: Hox proteins reach out round DNA. Genetic link to cervical tumours. A twist in a hedgehog's tale
  • Abstracts: Tree-species competition and coexistence. Coexistence of tropical tree species. Experimental evidence for apparent competition in a tropical forest food web
  • Abstracts: Calcium transients in astrocyte endfeet cause cerebrovascular constrictions. Hibernation in a tropical primate
  • Abstracts: Helicase snaps back. Socialism in one country. Cuba-innovation through synergy
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.