Prolonging life and allowing death: infants
Article Abstract:
The Institute of Medical Ethics holds that physicians are ultimately responsible for deciding whether to prolong or end the life of infants who, if they recover, will be disabled for life. However, the doctor is enjoined to share the decision-making burden with the caregivers, namely, parents and nurses. This is because recent court cases have given physicians and parents discretion in deciding whether the quality of life warrants prolonging the life of an infant. As a protective measure, such decisions should be recorded.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Not just autonomy - the principles of American biomedical ethics
Article Abstract:
The fourth edition of the book 'Principles of Biomedical Ethics' has yet to provide an adequate framework for addressing all bioethical issues. According to the authors, bioethics should be shaped by four principles: respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice. Their development of a theory based on American common-morality, however, results in a restricted framework for beneficence and justice as well as an absence of explicit decision rules for specification and balancing.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients
Article Abstract:
Physicians should consider not only medical facts but also patient-specific circumstances in order to make value judgments about the best medical care they can provide to their patients. Although somewhat paternalistic, this 'rational, non-interventional' approach is suggested because the fact-provider and shared decision-making models of health care delivery fail to take account of the moral aspects of physician practice.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Business ethics and politics in China. The role of character in business ethics. Socratic ethics and the challenge of globalization
- Abstracts: Conceptions of choice and conceptions of autonomy. Social freedom and the test of moral responsibility. Rewarding regret
- Abstracts: How we got over: the moral teachings of the African-American church on business ethics. A critique of social contracts for business
- Abstracts: On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? A reply. Artificial hydration and alimentation at the end of life: a reply to Craig
- Abstracts: The maturing of the Japanese economy: corporate social responsibility implications. The ontological and moral status of organizations