| Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2005 |
| Title | Subject | Authors |
|---|
| Back to the drawing board. | Social sciences | Agassi, Joseph |
| Galilean reflections on Milton Friedman's "Methodology of positive economics," with thoughts on Vernon Smith's "Economics in the laboratory". | Social sciences | Schliesser, Eric |
| Historical materialism and supervenience. | Social sciences | Farrelly, Colin |
| How to explain oppression: Criteria of adequacy for normative explanatory theories. | Social sciences | Cudd, Ann E. |
| How to think about rules and rule following. | Social sciences | Stueber, Karsten R. |
| Kuhnenstein: Or, the importance of being read. | Social sciences | Fuller, Steve |
| Lessons from biology for philosophy of the human sciences. | Social sciences | Rosenberg, Alex |
| Let's pretend! Children and joint action. | Social sciences | Tollefsen, Deborah |
| Michael Polanyi and Jewish identity. | Social sciences | Knepper, Paul |
| Norms, invariance, and explanatory relevance. | Social sciences | Henderson, David |
| Reasons, causes, and action explanation. | Social sciences | Risjord, Mark |
| Rethinking practices and structures. | Social sciences | Berard, T.J. |
| Science and Culture. | Social sciences | Sassower, Raphael |
| Self-in-a-vat: On John Searle's ontology of reasons for acting. | Social sciences | Kaufmann, Laurence |
| Should social science be critical? | Social sciences | Hammersley, Martyn |
| The Ghost of Wittgenstein: Forms of life, scientific method, and cultural critique.(Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein ) | Social sciences | Lynch, William T. |
| The relevance of rules to a critical social science. | Social sciences | Wisnewski, Jeremy |
| Three grades of normative involvement: Risjord, Stueber, and Henderson on norms and explanation. | Social sciences | Roth, Paul A. |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
