Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Release of pressure on insurers' purses

Article Abstract:

In the Nov 18 1992 UK Court of Appeal decision Gibbons and Others versus South West Water Services aggravated and exemplary damages were disallowed. The decision may result in the non-increase of insurance premiums. The plaintiffs suffered unpleasant effects from the accidental spillage of 29 tonnes of aluminium sulphate. The defendants admitted breach of contract and awards were granted. Awards for exemplary and aggravated damages were disallowed because the privatised water company was not fulfilling governmental duties and the claim did not demonstate that 'tort did not pay'.

Author: Lloyd, Humphrey
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Environmental aspects, Pollution, Water pollution, Gibbons, South West Water Services

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Who wins when principles clash?

Article Abstract:

Conflicts of principles within UK contractual law is complicated. In cases involving retention, under a standard form of contract a person entitled to retention has a right to have the retention put in a special bank account, even if there is no express provision in the contract. In GPT Realisations versus Panatown, Oct 8 1992, a person's right not to hand over money if it might materially prejudice him won the conflict over the right to retention.

Author: Lloyd, Humphrey
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Conflict of laws, GPT Realisations, Panatown

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Hong Kong rejects weak set-off link

Article Abstract:

A ruling in the Hong Kong court illustrates the limited nature of the right to withhold payment due because of an outstanding claim on another contract. It also brings into focus the legal position of the Government. The Government lost the case brought by Paul Y Construction which had not been paid for a contract because of an outstanding claim on an earlier, unrelated contract.

Author: Lloyd, Humphrey
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Payment, Public contracts, Government contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Contracts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: USPS tests software, prepares for new rates. Revamped campaign replaces sampling
  • Abstracts: A plague on your houses. Way off beam. Welcome to the jungle
  • Abstracts: Doen among the lost tribes of Milton Keynes. High noon approaches for cable versus wireless. Developing an appropriate sense of proportion
  • Abstracts: Breeze blocks. Eureka project goes back to basics to move foreward with common knowledge. The meccano set
  • Abstracts: W T globetrotters find new riches. New year boost for Lelliott. Higgs and Hill on survival path
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.