Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Government

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Government

Class of '92: the Proposition 140 babies

Article Abstract:

The Assembly Class of '92 represents the biggest group of freshman lawmakers to arrive in Sacramento, CA, since 1966 and is the first batch under Proposition 140 which sets term limits for elected public officials. The Class of '92 also reflects the Assembly's future composition in terms of gender, party and race. Most of the members feel that term limits lend a sense of urgency to their role and putemphasis on what they have to achieve within their term. They have successfullyurged the more senior members to come on time during meetings and look forward to initiating more changes in the future.

Author: Price, Charles M.
Publisher: Information for Public Affairs Inc.
Publication Name: California Journal
Subject: Government
ISSN: 0008-1205
Year: 1993
Officials and employees, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Legislators, California. Legislature. Assembly

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Signing for fun and profit: the business of gathering petition signatures

Article Abstract:

Professional petitioning increases the chances of proposed initiatives to reach ballot status. This practice resulted from the difficulties encountered in procuring the number of required signatures within the time limit as California's population increased. The Kimball Petition Management in Los Angeles and the American Petition Consultants of Sacramento engage in this business which also involves subcontracting solicitors, offering various initiative packages and collecting valid signatures.

Author: Price, Charles M.
Publisher: Information for Public Affairs Inc.
Publication Name: California Journal
Subject: Government
ISSN: 0008-1205
Year: 1992
Management, Services, Political activity, Political aspects, Corporations, Political action committees, Signatures (Writing), Kimball Petition Management, American Petition Consultants

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Free speech versus property rights

Article Abstract:

The Chico Waremart, now known as Winco, in California is involved in a courtcase against Progessive petitioners, in which the retail business is attempting to protect its private property rights, while the petitioners believe they are exercising the right to free speech. The case echoes the 1979 Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins case, which was won by Robins.

Author: Price, Charles M.
Publisher: Information for Public Affairs Inc.
Publication Name: California Journal
Subject: Government
ISSN: 0008-1205
Year: 2001
Cases, Freedom of speech, California, Civil rights, Right of property, Property rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mission impossible!? On the harmonization of national allocation plans under the EU emissions trading directive
  • Abstracts: Rookies of the year. Proposition 227 (Bilingual Education). Ron Gonzalez: City Hall veteran tackles San Jose's high-tech issues
  • Abstracts: The worst of times. Disappearing consultants. A stacked deck?
  • Abstracts: "Migrant mother": a Central Valley legacy. Does being green mean being a spoiler? The last lap?
  • Abstracts: Looking ahead to a 21st century crisis. The price of clean. Transportation secretary Norman Mineta
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.