Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Public agencies held not liable for approving defective plans

Article Abstract:

The legal responsibilities of several public agencies in Kenner, LA, were put on trial when residents of an apartment complex, plus their architect, sued them for approving faulty building plans that resulted in a fire that destroyed the complex. Three courts found that the public agencies were not at fault, because either the residents had failed to show evidence or the agencies should not be held accountable for mistakes an engineer or architects could have made.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Cregger, William L.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1993
Building inspection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Total-cost method for proving damages

Article Abstract:

A total-cost method of quantifying damages is proving efficient in resolving contractor-subcontractor court litigations, as illustrated in the fast and accurate resolution of a litigation between Taylor and Polk Construction and Mill Valley Construction. This method provides for accurate assessment of damages and helps in proving, beyond reasonable doubt, the proximate cause of damage.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Cregger, William L.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1995
Construction industry, Labor disputes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Contract interpretation

Article Abstract:

The drafting of a contract is a vital function of civil engineering. Parties involved in a contract must carefully select and use words that clearly express their intent. Failure to do so may probably result which may lead to legal action. Courts will usually comprehend contracts as written unless contracts violate some rule of law or public policy.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Cregger, William L.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1995
Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Usage, Contracts, Breach of contract, Contract clause (United States Constitution)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A piece of the dinosaur killer found? A shocking view of the Permo-Triassic. Second crater points to killer comets
  • Abstracts: Is science lobbying an oxymoron? NIH up, for now; fusion down. The cost of scientific pork keeps going up
  • Abstracts: Clinton defends R&D in partisan speech. Democrats urge Clinton to stand up for R&D programs. Moderation in science budgeting
  • Abstracts: Assignment of arbitration rights. Which is the prevailing party in arbitration? The law
  • Abstracts: The Clinton plan. Clinton budget for FY 1994. Clinton takes the reins
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.