Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 1998 - Abstracts

Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 1998
TitleSubjectAuthors
A critique of recent opinions of the Federal Circuit in patent interferences.LawGholz, Charles L.
America's inventors have arrived (and we thought they were "invisible.")LawKelly, Donald Grant
An argument for the implementation of a biometric authentication system ("BAS").LawPetti, David A.
A prototype of WIPO's intellectual property digital library (IPDL) becomes operational.(World Intellectual Property Organization)Law 
A purge to willful patent infringement.LawLydon, James C.
Be a good sport and refrain from using my patented putt: intellectual property protection for sports related movements.LawKukkonen, Carl A.
Committee 703 report.LawAbraham, David J.
Conception, testing, reduction to practice: when is it really on sale? (patents)LawMueller, Janice M.
Copyright protection of computer programs.LawKravetz, Paul I.
Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies: the final say on appellate review of claim construction?LawDunner, Donald R., Kwon, Howard A.
Ephemeral infringement by customizable software: liability structures to promote new technology and protect the old.LawHaldiman, Robert C.
Extending process claims from intermediate to final product: avoiding the trap of Eli Lilly.LawMaebius, Stephen B.
Gabby in Wonderland - through the Internet looking glass.LawSlavitt, Kelly M.
Gene therapy and patents.LawFlanagan, John K.
International patent applications and the section 102(e) dates of patents issuing therefrom. (Patent Code section 102(e)) (response to Edward P. Heller III and Richard A. Neifeld, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, p. 883, December 1997, p. 71, January 1998, p. 141, February 1998)LawHoover, Allen E.
Intervening rights: a potential hidden trap for reexamined patents.LawGuttag, Eric W.
Inventing history: the holder of the first U.S. patent.LawMaxey, David W.
Invention disclosure services: needed change for a needed system.LawBristol, Lynn A.
Means plus and step plus function claims: do we only know them when we see them?LawLee, William F., Paige, Eugene M.
Mediation - from "pledge" to industry-wide promise.LawHollander, Seymour E.
Noteworty PTO trademark decisions.(Patent and Trademark Office).LawSamuels, Jeffrey M., Samuels, Linda B.
Only obvious variations infringe.LawWhitmyer, Wesley W., Jr.
Patenting your Website: it's all a matter of design.LawSchramm, David
Patents and manufacturing in the Early Republic.LawWalterscheid, Edward C.
Petitions practice within the Patent and Trademark Office on Patent Matters.LawHershkovitz, Abraham
Planning for a global system.LawMeller, Michael N.
Possible defenses to complaints for copyright infringement and reverse engineering of computer software: implications for antitrust and I.P. law.LawMills, John G.
Protection of intellectual property rights against bankruptcy.LawMorris, Paula, Jensen, Bradley
Recovering attorney fees & damages when defending against bad faith patent litigation.LawBeem, Richard P.
Should the clear & convincing evidence standard for rebutting the presumption of validity apply when the challenger raises a substantial new question of patentability?LawFleming, Clarence J.
Significant recent trademark decisions.LawSamuels, Jeffrey M., Samuels, Linda B.
Stare un-decisis: the sometimes rough treatment of precedent in Federal Circuit decision-making.LawRooklidge, William C., Weil, Matthew F.
Statement of the Patent & Trademark Office Society to the United States Patent and Trademark Office on procedures for recording patent prosecution file histories.Law 
The 35 USC 102(e) date of a continuation of an international application.LawNeifeld, Richard A., Heller, Edward P., III
The 35 USC 102(e) date of a continuation of an international application (part 2). (United Kingdom)LawNeifeld, Richard A., Heller, Edward P., III
The BPAI and the TTAB are required to set forth specific findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to form a basis for appellate review. (Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)LawGholz, Charles L.
The Economic Espionage Act: a prosecution update.LawMossinghoff, Gerald J., Mason, J. Derek, Oblon, David A.
The law and practice under 35 USC 135(c). (part 1)LawGholz, Charles L.
The law and practice under 35 USC 135(c). (part 2)LawGholz, Charles L.
The legal battles of G.I. Joe: the jurisprudence of distinctive fingernails, actions figures, ninjas, and distinguished marines.LawGuggenheim, A. Jack
The mutation on the description requirement gene.LawPitlick, Harris A.
The recline and fall of mechanical genus claim scope under "written description" in the sofa case.LawPretty, Laurence H.
The strategic use of means-plus-function claims.LawMaier, Gregory J., Lytle, Bradley D.
To promote the progress of useful arts: American patent law and administration, 1787-1836. (part 2)LawWalterscheid, Edward C.
Undressing Abercrombie: defining when trade dress is inherently distinctive.LawSmith, Chad M.
What's left of In re Braat after In re Berg?LawGholz, Charles L.
When trade dress protection may not be enough: two recent case studies.LawLikourezos, George
WIPO reports on the growth of the Patent Cooperation Treaty in 1997. (World Intellectual Property Organization).Law 
World patent system circa 20XX, A.D.LawMossinghoff, Gerald J., Kuo, Vivian S.
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.