SIECUS Report 1997 - Abstracts

SIECUS Report 1997
TitleSubjectAuthors
1996-97 trends in opposition to comprehensive sexuality education in public schools in the United States. (includes related articles on views of a school board member; program scale back; impact of student activism; elimination of an elementary sexuality education program)Social sciencesMayer, Ruth
88 million dollars for "abstinence-only".Social sciencesEdwards, Mac
"Abstinence-only" curricula without the fear.Social sciences 
Adolescence and abstinence.Social sciences 
A sabbatical's lessons.Social sciencesHaffner, Debra W.
A SIECUS annotated bibliography of organizations and available materials.Social sciences 
A view from the field.Social sciencesNachama Beth Bomze, Bracha
But does it work? Improving evaluations of sexuality education. (includes related articles on highlights of October 1996 SIECUS symposium; life behaviors of a sexually healthy adult; symposium participants; methods of measurement)Social sciencesHaffner, Debra W., Goldfarb, Eva S.
Clergy as sexuality educators: What are seminaries doing? What do they need to do?Social sciencesConklin, Sarah C.
Exclusive purpose: abstinence-only proponents create federal entitlement in welfare reform.Social sciencesDaley, Daniel
Guidelines for comprehensive sexuality education: Kindergarten-12th grade.(Fact Sheet)Social sciences 
Helping health care professionals on issues of intimacy and sexuality among the aging.Social sciencesBronner, Gila
How are we doing? Evaluation as part of sexuality education.Social sciencesBrick, Peggy
IOM committee recommends strategies for a national STD-prevention system. (Institute of Medicine Committee on Prevention and Control of STDs)Social sciences 
MISH publishes new framework for fear-based, abstinence-only education. (Medical Institute for Sexual Health)Social sciencesMayer, Ruth
New directions in HIV prevention.Social sciencesRosser, B.R.
Older Americans with HIV/AIDS.Social sciencesKun, Karen E., Schwartz, Rebeca
On-line activism: from easy education to political potency. (use of the Internet in sexuality education)(includes list of key Web site addresses)Social sciencesDaley, Daniel, Herbert, Sonja
Personal views on love and intimacy.Social sciencesGordon, Sol, Kassman, Leon, Weinstock, S. Alexander, Fagin, Sylvia, George, Kenneth D.
Preserving reproductive choice: preventing STD-related infertility in women.Social sciencesDeLisle, Susan
Religion, spirituality, and sexuality.Social sciences 
Secrecy surrounding sexuality hinders STD-prevention programs.(Editorial)Social sciencesEdwards, Mac
Sexuality and underserved youth in communities of color.Social sciences 
Sexually transmitted diseases in the United States.Social sciences 
Sorting the hope from the hype: Practical suggestions for community-based AIDS treatment education.Social sciencesCooper, Sally
Television talk shows: making intimacies public.Social sciencesGreenberg, Bradley S., Rampoldi-Hnilo, Lynn, Sherry, John S., Smith, Sandi W.
The abstinence-only initiative points to the need for evaluations. (sexuality education evaluations)(Editorial)Social sciencesEdwards, Mac
The Clinton administration's adolescent pregnancy prevention program: ignorance does not equal abstinence.Social sciencesFlinn, Susan K.
The hidden epidemic: confronting sexually transmitted diseases.Social sciences 
The HIV pandemic still deserves the best from us.Social sciencesHaffner, Debra W.
The journey of sexuality educators to faith communities.Social sciencesBoyer, Maggi Ruth P., Donohue, Ann Marie
The National Coalition to Support Sexuality Education.Social sciences 
The really good news: What the bible says about sex.Social sciencesHaffner, Debra W.
The sexuality education programs of religious groups and denominations.Social sciencesPhillipson Cole, Elma
What's love got to do with it?Social sciencesHaffner, Debra W.
What's wrong with abstinence-only sexuality education programs?Social sciencesHaffner, Debra W.
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.